Empowering young Australians to be a clear Christian voice

Upholding marriage = inequality?

Maintaining a distinction between marriage relationships and committed same-gender relationships does not imply inequality. Rather, it means that we can continue to affirm that marriage, by incorporating family, social and biological rights and responsibilities into a universally recognised institution, is truly something to be ‘honoured by all’.

Bishop Ross Nicholson, Tasmania

As we said yesterday, same-sex “marriage” is not a social justice issue. Why? Firstly, legalising same-sex “marriage” legitimises the destructive homosexual lifestyle. Hear from those who have experienced the lifestyle: Janet Boynes and Dawn Stefanowicz.

Secondly, it takes away the rights of children to grow up with their biological mum and dad. There is no social justice in same-sex “marriage”.

Removing gender from marriage also destroys diversity and leads society towards the loss of sexual difference.

But what about inequality and discrimination? Isn’t equality important?

It’s important to have the correct understanding. Rob Agnelli discusses the two principles here.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on August 9, 2012 by in Marriage & sexuality and tagged , , , , , .

FamilyVoice Australia

Follow us on Twitter

  • If you haven't already, be sure to head over and like FamilyVoice Australia for regular updates on issues... fb.me/8jugLUBcR voiced 1 year ago

Support our work

Learnt something useful? Help us keep this up by donating!
%d bloggers like this: